Now,
few decisions are made by Parliament have a more direct impact on your daily
life than the finance bill.
It's
a piece of legislation that ultimately determines how much tax you pay, what
goods become more expensive,
and
how much money the government can raise from taxpayers over the next year.
That
is why the final vote on the finance bill is widely regarded as one of the most
important moments on
Parliament's
calendar. Yet when MPs gathered on Thursday night to make that decision, more
than half of them were
nowhere
to be seen. Only 162 lawmakers participated in the vote that paved way
for
the finance bill of 2026 to move a step closer to becoming law. The outcome now
leaves behind a question that is
proving
just as controversial as the bill itself. Where were the other
186
members of parliament? NV's David Mudoka reports.
The
eyes electronic vote 103, manual vote 19, total 122.
The
N electronic vote 36, manual vote 4, total 40. And with that
declaration
from National Assembly Speaker Moses Wangula on Thursday night, the finance
bill 2026
sailed
through the National Assembly and now awaits President William R's signature.
History
will record that when a time was required to stand for country, you were there.
But let me finally thank the
people
of Kenya because they have been patient with us. They have allowed us to go
through the motions of legislation or
the
legislative process without the interruptions we have seen in the past and they
can now bear witness and trust
us
and trust the process that we you will be listened to. While much of the public
debate prior to the vote focused
on
the contents of the bill and its impact on taxpayers, attention is now shifting
to the turnout inside the House
itself.
According to figures announced by the speaker, 122 MPs voted in favor of the
bill while
40
voted against it. That means only 162 members took part in a vote that will
affect millions of Kenyans.
Order.
Ordinarily,
the National Assembly comprises 349 members. However, the
current
membership stands at 348 following the death of former Onalo MP
David
Kaho. Subtract the 162 MPs who participated in Thursday's vote and the
result
is 186 lawmakers who failed to take part in one of the most important
parliamentary
decisions of the year. In other words, more than half of Kenya's elected
representatives were absent from
one
of the most consequential decisions of the year. The contrast becomes even
sharper when viewed against another
defining
parliamentary moment in October 2024 when MPs voted on the impeachment of
former deputy president Riad
Gashagwa.
The house was nearly full. A total of 326 MPs participated in that
vote.
Of those 281 supported the impeachment, 44 opposed it
while
one member abstained. To me, an MP who decides not to vote is as bad as the
one
who's decided to vote yes because we voted them in to represent us. And part of
representing us is not making noise.
It's
not yapping and it's not trying to lecture us. It is making a decision.
Among
the lawmakers who are absent from Thursday's proceedings for various reasons
were caps MP Oscar Sudi, Maragua
MP
Mary Wawa, NIA MP George Kyuki, Kiwoman Representative Doris Dona and Mara MP
Kimuki.
Others
included nominated MP Sabina Age, Tinderet MP and education committee
chairperson
Julius Mele, Thica Town MP and social protection committee chairperson
Alisanga, Kimlei MP Das
Barasa
and Kiharu MP Doro. Kenyans earning below 30,000 shillings deserves
a
reply vulnerable speaker and especially in a situation where their pockets are
rated from every direction.
5:035
minutes, 3 secondsNuro's absence drew particular attention given his outspoken
opposition to the bill. NTV has since established that he
had
traveled out of the country before the vote took place. Unless you had leg
legitimate reasons to not attend the
session
yesterday, there is no reason there is no other reason. There's no other
justification as to why you decided not to vote yesterday and not to
show
up in parliament. Reacting to the events, former deputy president Gashagwa
stated, and I quote, "History will
remember
the 40 honorable members of the National Assembly who on those day stood with
the people of Kenya. For those who
voted
yes to oppress the people who elected them, as well as those who deliberately
kept off when it mattered
most,
I am sure Mr. William R is very happy with you and shall reward you handsomely.
In response to the law
turnout,
activist James Mula has proposed two measures aimed at ensuring lawmakers do
not skip parliamentary
seatings
that directly affect ordinary Kenyans. The first he argues requires
constitutional intervention.
For
any other bill, consequential bill like the amendment of the constitution, you
need at least onethird of the members of national assembly.
But
for bills like the finance bill which are not considered consequential in our
constitution and that needs to change by the way the threshold and the
quorum
is at 50 MPs. You only need 50 MPs to vote on the finance bill.
Just
50. [laughter] So if 50 attended, 51 attended yesterday's session and 30
voted
for the finance bill and 21 voted against the finance bill. That would be law.
That would be it done and dusted.
The
second remedy he says lies with the voters themselves.
Was
it pilot washed his his hands? By the way, that was the highest form of
cowardice.
As
an MP, as a leader, as a representative, it is incumbent on you to make a
decision when it matters most. You cannot abstain. You cannot walk away.
You
[snorts] are as guilty as the one who voted yes. You are as guilty as the one
who decided to vote against the people and vote for a bill that only
favors
the executive and the government of the day. So in my opinion, I think they
should be sent home.
https://youtu.be/0ou0WBnWUg0?si=jreOkke1jpPac6N0
No comments:
Post a Comment